Whiteford

Colorado Law

Colorado law is built on a principle courts have honored for more than a century: no one should profit from wrongfully killing another person — including by inheriting from them.

Clear, quoted fees for planning — and contingency options for inheritance disputes where appropriate.Contingency representation for injury cases.

Free consultations — a straight answer before any engagement

Clear fees — quoted planning fees in writing; contingency options for disputes where appropriate

Denver based, with Whiteford's national trusts & estates platform (ACTEC fellows, Chambers-ranked)

24/7 intake — a real conversation and a booked consultation, any hour

It is a question most families never imagine asking, until a tragedy forces it: if one family member wrongfully causes another's death, can they still inherit from the person they killed? Colorado's answer is a firm no. Under what lawyers call the slayer rule, a person who feloniously and intentionally kills another forfeits the inheritance, insurance proceeds, and other benefits they would have received from their victim's death.

The rule sounds like it should rarely matter — and thankfully, it rarely does. But when it does, the stakes and emotions are enormous, and the legal questions are more intricate than the moral principle suggests. What counts as a disqualifying killing? What happens to the forfeited share? Does the rule apply without a criminal conviction? These questions land on grieving families at the worst possible moment.

Whiteford's Colorado team handles the estate side of these tragedies with the care they demand. This page explains the rule's logic, its surprisingly broad reach, and how it actually gets applied in probate proceedings.

The principle: forfeiture, not punishment

The slayer rule isn't a criminal penalty — the criminal courts handle punishment. It's a rule of property and inheritance law, built on the equitable maxim that no one should be permitted to profit from their own wrong. When the rule applies, the law generally treats the killer as if they had died before their victim: their inheritance rights, beneficiary designations, and survivorship interests are unwound, and the victim's estate flows to the people who would have taken had the killer never stood in line.

That 'treated as predeceased' mechanism matters, because it answers the practical question of where the forfeited share goes — typically to alternate beneficiaries or other heirs, not to the state and not to the killer's own chosen successors as a workaround. Colorado's version of the rule is generally triggered by a felonious and intentional killing; accidents and genuinely non-culpable causes of death do not strip an heir of an inheritance.

How far the rule reaches

People tend to assume the slayer rule is about wills — a murderer can't take under the victim's will. True, but that's the narrowest slice of it. Death moves property through many channels, and a forfeiture rule that covered only wills would be trivially easy to circumvent. Colorado's rule is therefore built to follow the money across essentially every way a death transfers value.

In broad terms, the disqualification reaches the full landscape of death-time transfers, including these.

  • Gifts under the victim's will, and shares that would pass by intestacy when there is no will
  • Life insurance proceeds and other beneficiary-designated assets naming the killer
  • Survivorship rights in joint tenancy property, which are severed rather than allowed to enrich the killer
  • Interests flowing through trusts, retirement accounts, and similar nonprobate arrangements
  • Fiduciary roles — a killer generally cannot serve as personal representative or trustee for the victim's estate

Convictions, civil findings, and the hard gray areas

The rule's most misunderstood feature is its relationship to criminal court. A final criminal conviction for the qualifying killing generally settles the matter for inheritance purposes. But the absence of a conviction does not mean the inheritance proceeds untouched — the probate court can make its own determination that the killing was felonious and intentional, using the civil standard of proof, which is less demanding than the criminal one. An heir who was acquitted, never charged, or died before trial can still be found disqualified in the estate proceeding.

The genuinely hard cases live in the gray zones: deaths involving self-defense claims, serious mental illness, assisted dying, or reckless conduct short of intent — and families divided over whether to raise the issue at all. These proceedings are painful, and they benefit from counsel who can be both rigorous and humane. Whiteford's Colorado team, part of a Chambers-ranked national trusts and estates platform with ACTEC fellows in the section, approaches them that way. And for anyone whose real concern is broader — making sure an estate plan handles even unthinkable contingencies cleanly — the free Colorado Estate Snapshot at /estate-snapshot and a free Legacy Game Plan Session are quiet places to start.

The law, current

What Colorado families should know in 2026

$15M

Federal exemption — now permanent

The 2025 federal tax law made the estate and gift tax exemption permanent at $15,000,000 per person (indexed) beginning in 2026 — roughly $30M for a married couple with proper planning. Colorado imposes no state estate or inheritance tax. Plans written under older, lower exemptions often carry structures families no longer need — or miss opportunities they now have.

UPC

Colorado probate: simpler — but not simple

Colorado follows the Uniform Probate Code: many estates qualify for informal probate, and small estates under an inflation-indexed threshold can often skip court entirely via affidavit. But without a will, Colorado's intestate-succession statutes — not your wishes — decide who inherits, and blended families are where those defaults surprise people most.

Clocks

Dispute deadlines run quietly

Will contests, trust challenges, creditor claims, and fiduciary-misconduct actions in Colorado all carry deadlines — some triggered by notices a beneficiary may not even recognize as starting a clock. If something about an estate feels wrong, the single most protective step is learning your specific deadlines early.

Sources: Pub. L. 119-21 (2025) (federal exemption); Colo. Rev. Stat. Title 15 (probate, intestacy, small-estate collection; Colorado Uniform Trust Code). General information, not legal or tax advice; thresholds adjust and exceptions apply.

Not another "initial consult"

The Legacy Game Plan Session

30 minutes with our Colorado team. You leave with a clear plan — whether or not you engage us.

Clear, quoted fees for planning — and contingency options for inheritance disputes where appropriate.

Every engagement starts with a written scope and fee agreement. No surprises, no hourly mystery bills for planning work.

Your document & deadline check

What you have, what's missing, and any clock that's already running — probate windows, contest periods, tax elections.

The exposure map

Where your estate (or your inheritance) is actually vulnerable: probate costs, incapacity gaps, tax exposure, or a problem fiduciary.

A straight answer

Whether your situation needs an attorney at all. If a simple will or a phone call solves it, we'll say so — for free.

Your next-three-steps memo

The specific documents to gather or actions to take, in order, whatever you decide about hiring us.

You leave with all four — whether or not you ever hire us. No pressure, no obligation, no fine print.

How it works

A clear process, from first contact to resolution

01

Tell us where things stand

A free, confidential conversation — or start with the two-minute Estate Snapshot. Planning or dispute, we listen first; no obligation, no pressure.

02

We map documents and deadlines

What exists, what's missing, and every clock that's running — probate windows, contest periods, tax elections. Estates are won and lost on timing.

03

We design — or investigate

For planning: a design built around your family, assets, and tax picture. For disputes: records, accountings, and title work that show what actually happened.

04

Execute with national depth

Documents signed, trusts funded, plans that actually work — or a dispute pressed by a Chambers-ranked trusts and estates platform prepared to litigate when needed.

Your legal team

A Denver front door. A national trial platform.

Whiteford Mountain West pairs Colorado-based leadership with the trial depth of Whiteford's full national litigation platform — so serious cases get serious resources.

Peter D. Antonoplos, Partner · Co-Chair, Trusts & Estates

Peter D. Antonoplos

Partner · Co-Chair, Trusts & Estates

Whiteford national platform

Peter Antonoplos co-chairs Whiteford's Trusts and Estates section, bringing more than twenty years of experience advising individuals, families, businesses, and institutions on estate planning, trusts, asset protection, and complex estate and gift tax strategy.

Jeffrey R. Schell, Managing Director, Whiteford Mountain West

Jeffrey R. Schell

Managing Director, Whiteford Mountain West

Denver, Colorado

Jeff Schell is a Denver-based partner at Whiteford and the Managing Director of Whiteford Mountain West. A Colorado attorney, he was named one of ColoradoBiz Magazine's 25 Most Influential Young Professionals in Colorado.

Attorneys are admitted in the jurisdictions listed in their official firm profiles. Colorado matters are supervised and led through Whiteford's Colorado-admitted attorneys, with the firm's national trusts-and-estates counsel engaged on each matter as appropriate and permitted.

Frequently asked questions

Does the slayer rule require a murder conviction?

No — and this is the point families most often miss. A conviction for a qualifying killing generally resolves the question, but without one, the probate court can independently determine whether the death resulted from a felonious and intentional killing, using the civil standard of proof rather than the criminal beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard. That means someone acquitted in criminal court, never charged, or deceased before trial can still be disqualified from inheriting. The estate proceeding makes its own judgment on its own record.

Who inherits the share the slayer forfeits?

The law generally treats the killer as having died before the victim, so the forfeited interest passes to whoever stands next in line: alternate beneficiaries named in the will or on the account, or the victim's other heirs under intestacy rules. The forfeited share does not go to the state, and the mechanism is designed so the killer can't reroute the benefit to chosen successors as a workaround. Sorting out the redirected shares can get intricate — especially with joint property — and is usually resolved within the probate proceeding.

Does the rule apply to life insurance and joint bank accounts?

Yes. The disqualification follows value through essentially every death-time channel, not just the will. Insurance proceeds naming the killer as beneficiary are redirected as though the killer had predeceased, and survivorship rights in joint accounts and joint tenancy real estate are severed so the killer doesn't collect the victim's share automatically. Institutions holding these assets — insurers, banks, title companies — typically freeze payment once the issue is raised and wait for a court determination, which is one reason raising it promptly matters.

What about accidental deaths, self-defense, or mental illness?

The rule targets felonious and intentional killings — it is not a trap for accidents. A death caused by ordinary negligence does not disqualify an heir, and legitimate self-defense generally falls outside the rule. The harder territory involves diminished capacity and serious mental illness, where criminal and probate outcomes can diverge, and reckless conduct near the line of intent. These gray-zone cases turn heavily on their specific facts and evidence, and they're precisely where experienced probate counsel earns its role.

How does a family actually raise the slayer rule in an estate?

It typically surfaces inside the probate or trust proceeding: an interested person — often another heir or the personal representative — asserts the disqualification, and the court determines whether the rule applies before distributions are made. Practical early steps matter: notifying insurers and financial institutions so assets aren't paid out prematurely, preserving the criminal case record if one exists, and objecting if the person in question seeks appointment as personal representative. Because timing and procedure both matter, families in this situation should involve counsel early.

Where does your estate actually stand?

The free Colorado Estate Snapshot walks through what actually determines how estates fare in Colorado — documents, titling, taxes, family structure, and the deadlines nobody mentions — in about two minutes. No obligation, and no pressure. Want a real answer instead? Book a free Legacy Game Plan Session and leave with a plan.

Educational only — not legal or tax advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created.

Related Colorado estate resources